Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

Students are able to explain, interpretate, and analylize texts in pragmatics perspectives, especially relating to  the meaning of the texts based on co-text, context of situation (register), and context of culture. 

• Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

  Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

  Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

  Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

  Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

  Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

  Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

  Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

  Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

  Yule, G. 2002. Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

  Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

  Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 
• Peccei, Jean Stillwell. 1999. Pragmatics. London: Routledge.

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

Students are able to explain, interpretate, and analylize texts in pragmatics perspectives, especially relating to  the meaning of the texts based on co-text, context of situation (register), and context of culture. 

• Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

  Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

  Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

  Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

  Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

  Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

  Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

  Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

  Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

  Yule, G. 2002. Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

  Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

  Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 
• Peccei, Jean Stillwell. 1999. Pragmatics. London: Routledge.

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

Students are able to explain, interpretate, and analylize texts in pragmatics perspectives, especially relating to  the meaning of the texts based on co-text, context of situation (register), and context of culture. 

• Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

  Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

  Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

  Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

  Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

  Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

  Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

  Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

  Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

  Yule, G. 2002. Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

  Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

  Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 
• Peccei, Jean Stillwell. 1999. Pragmatics. London: Routledge.

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

Students are able to explain, interpretate, and analylize texts in pragmatics perspectives, especially relating to  the meaning of the texts based on co-text, context of situation (register), and context of culture. 

• Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

  Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

  Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

  Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

  Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

  Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

  Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

  Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

  Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

  Yule, G. 2002. Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

  Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

  Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 
• Peccei, Jean Stillwell. 1999. Pragmatics. London: Routledge.

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

1. Skill
   1. The students are expected to be able to perform spoken and written discourses
2. Knowledge
   1. The students are expected to be able to explain  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning..
3. Attitude
   1. The students are expected to have high responsibility.
   2. The students are expected to be independence, discipline, active, creative and innovative.

Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

Paltridge, Brian. (2012). Discourse analysis: an Introduction. 2^nd ed., Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

1. Skill
   1. The students are expected to be able to perform spoken and written discourses
2. Knowledge
   1. The students are expected to be able to explain  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning..
3. Attitude
   1. The students are expected to have high responsibility.
   2. The students are expected to be independence, discipline, active, creative and innovative.

Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

Paltridge, Brian. (2012). Discourse analysis: an Introduction. 2^nd ed., Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

1. Skill
   1. The students are expected to be able to perform spoken and written discourses
2. Knowledge
   1. The students are expected to be able to explain  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning..
3. Attitude
   1. The students are expected to have high responsibility.
   2. The students are expected to be independence, discipline, active, creative and innovative.

Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

Paltridge, Brian. (2012). Discourse analysis: an Introduction. 2^nd ed., Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

1. Skill
   1. The students are expected to be able to perform spoken and written discourses
2. Knowledge
   1. The students are expected to be able to explain  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning..
3. Attitude
   1. The students are expected to have high responsibility.
   2. The students are expected to be independence, discipline, active, creative and innovative.

Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

Paltridge, Brian. (2012). Discourse analysis: an Introduction. 2^nd ed., Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between the meaning of an utterance and the context in which the utterance is produced. It introduces  the definition of  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning.

1. Skill
   1. The students are expected to be able to perform spoken and written discourses
2. Knowledge
   1. The students are expected to be able to explain  pragmatics, Deixis, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and entailment, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech acts and speech events, Politeness and interaction, Conversation and preference structure, Conversation Analysis, Discourse and culture, Pragmatic analysis, and Pragmatics and language teaching & learning..
3. Attitude
   1. The students are expected to have high responsibility.
   2. The students are expected to be independence, discipline, active, creative and innovative.

Austin (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students: A, B, C, D. London; New York: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Pragmatics (syntax and semantics) vol. 9, New York: Academic Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. 

Leech, G. (1983), Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

Paltridge, Brian. (2012). Discourse analysis: an Introduction. 2^nd ed., Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 

Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP

Sinclair J. McH. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: OUP.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.